photo report: national student demo against fees

Wednesday 25th saw around 700 students march through London in protest against top-up fees and demanding free university education for all. The demo, predominantly organised by the Socialist Workers’ Party and Education is Not for Sale (involving independent socialists and anarchists but also led to a significant degree by the Alliance for Workers’ Liberty), was the first such demo in the last couple of years, given the National Union of Students’ virtual abandonment of any commitment to free education and its Labourite leaders’ cosying-up to the state bureaucracy, meekly making pleas that the government ought not increase fees beyond £3,000 upon its 2010 review.

Activists from across the country attended the demonstration, but the bulk of those attending were either from Trotskyist groups and their peripheries or a bloc of people with anarchist flags. Although most of the speakers at both the start and end of the protest called for student-worker unity, and many of the slogans advocated support for trade union struggles, in fact there were very few workers on the demo, even from the ranks of the UCU or NUT, since there is in reality little integration between workers’ organisations and the student movement, even its left wing. Nor did working-class students from sixth form/FE colleges attend in strong numbers, although some are building a London School Students’ Union.

Unfortunately, the mobilisation was also weakened somewhat by the fact that there were two separate organising committees (one for each group)… such is sectarianism. Furthermore, the Socialist Party’s shallow front “Campaign to Defeat Fees”, who mobilised several dozen on their contingent but were not really involved in organising the demo itself, voiced the “line” that we ought to use this national demo against fees as a springboard for a… national demo against fees.

Students have of course mobilised en masse in opposition to the Gaza war – 27 faculties having been occupied in the last couple of months – but when asked to protest in defence of specifically university-centred concerns seem to be rather less effective, no doubt in part due to the transitory nature of their spell in higher education and the extreme difficulty of successfully resisting measures such as fees, which cannot be pushed back in any one institution. Of course, more blandly “bread and butter” concerns such as free education should be at the heart of the student movement’s struggles, but it is also the case that so-called “big politics” around such issues as ecology or imperialism are of equal or greater importance for many young people.

Below are some photos and comments on the day:

p25-02-09_1235

Protesters assembled in front of SOAS around noon. In speeches to the crowd, speakers from Education Not for Sale called for a new national union based on progressive student unions: perhaps a somewhat distant objective, given the vast resources of NUS and the very weak student participation in the structures of even more ‘activist’ SUs. Working both inside and outside NUS may be necessary given the fact that most students have very little awareness of the recent anti-democratic Governance Review, and, of course, student union backing is no prerequisite of effective activism involving students.

p25-02-09_1325011

“Fuck 1968: Act Now!”: the constant comparisons of all and every student action to the mass movements of the 1960s by some leftists in NUS does indeed raise rather false expectations about what is likely to be achieved, although it does make it easier for the big Trotskyist groups’ leaders to stir their members to activity.

p25-02-09_1407

The Socialist Workers’ Party were not always in control of the university occupations in opposition to the Israeli attack on Gaza, reflecting the weakening on their grip over the anti-war movement over the last five years. Although not necessarily at the hub of that wave of student activism, they were out in force at the anti-fees demo. Leading a sit-down of around a hundred and fifty people at High Holborn, two minutes later the SWP organisers then told their members to get up again. This left several dozen people still sitting on the road, causing a minor stand-off with police which saw the march grind to a halt for fifteen minutes.

p25-02-09_1522021

The demo finished with a rally outside King’s College on the Strand.

11 thoughts on “photo report: national student demo against fees

  1. David,

    I certainly agree with your emphasis on “big ideas” being crucial to organising students. The point is that student unions are NOT trade unions due to the transitory nature of being a student and also the fact that the student-university relationship is not that of boss-worker.

    When most of the left look at the Gaza demonstrations, they wish we could only see similar militancy on the “bread and butter” issues. This schema though has only the most tenuous relationship to reality, as yesterday made quite clear – a Gaza student solidarity demonstration would have probably pulled more numbers, and there are good reasons for this too.

    Nevertheless, even if students were inspired in the main by the “bread and butter” issues, it is hardly incumbent upon revolutionaries to peddle narrow “bread and butter” trade unionist politics (Trade Unionism in the sense Lenin uses it).

    What matters is politics and political organisation. We do need to break with the “broad front” approaches geared at building the “vanguard party” bureaucratic centralist Trot sects. “Anything but Marxism!” will not get us anywhere.

    My very brief report here:
    http://communiststudents.org.uk/2009/02/educate-agitate-organise/

    wcg

    Ben

    Like

  2. “In fact there were very few workers on the demo, even from the ranks of the UCU or NUT, since there is in reality little integration between workers’ organisations and the student movement.”
    Or, erm, maybe they were just at work? Isn’t this just a bit silly?

    Like

  3. Marcus: well, holding the demo during the day is something that may put off workers so that question might be weighed up… Although of course many of us work evening shifts.

    Sacha: in Socialist Worker SWP have presented the demo as just being organised by their front Another Education is Possible, as you yourself have commented on Educationet. On the ENS site it does not mention AEIP by name, saying it was “organised by Education Not for Sale in alliance with other socialists, anti-capitalists and free education campaigners, as well as a number of student unions and the NUS Women’s, LGBT and Black Students’ Campaign”. Everything I have read on the ENS list and what I heard at the demo gave me the strong impression that the organisation was done in two parts (+ the SP, of course).

    Like

  4. “holding the demo during the day is something that may put off workers.”
    So what are you proposing? An evening demo that may put off everybody? A weekend student demo that would be better for teachers but harder for students?
    David, have you ever organised a demo before? Or are you just looking for a little critical angle?

    Like

  5. Many people including myself have organised actions on evenings and weekends. Plenty of students managed to attend the biggest Gaza demos, which were held on Saturday afternoons… moreover, many of them have tutorials and lectures on weekdays.

    Like

  6. Alan: Exactly, in Sheffield Hallam, the Anarchist Federation co-operated with StWC/SWP, HOPI, Amnesty and the Islamic Society. Manchester has a number of non-party affiliated students in the occupation too.

    Like

  7. Hi, just to say, the next issue of The Commune will carry an analysis of the occupations – size, scope, success, meaning, variations from place to place. If you have any reports or information you’d like us to consider, please email us or post on this site.

    Like

Comments are closed.